Human Geography

Human Geography
Rosel, Runar, Simona and Nikita
1 / 27
suivant
Slide 1: Diapositive
MentorlesWOStudiejaar 1

Cette leçon contient 27 diapositives, avec quiz interactifs et diapositives de texte.

time-iconLa durée de la leçon est: 40 min

Éléments de cette leçon

Human Geography
Rosel, Runar, Simona and Nikita

Slide 1 - Diapositive

“How has the Fukushima nuclear disaster influenced migration patterns, urban development and community resilience in Japan looking from a human geography perspective?”

Slide 2 - Diapositive

Human Geography

Slide 3 - Carte mentale

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
“Concepts of people, place, and the environment, as well as the dynamics and interconnected relationships between them.” 
• Migration patterns, urban development, community resilience

Human geography
(Cirella, 2024)

Slide 4 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• Migratory response
• Steps of evacuation
• The Japanese evacuee data 
collection system
• The evacuees


Migration patterns
(Do, 2019; Gemmenne et al., 2012; Hauer et al., 2020)

Slide 5 - Diapositive

Urban development refers to the process of growth, expansion, and transformation of urban areas, encompassing physical, economic, social, and environmental aspects of urban life. It involves the planning, design, construction, and management of infrastructure, buildings, public spaces, and services to accommodate the needs of urban populations.”

Urban development refers to the process of growth, expansion, and transformation of urban areas, encompassing physical, economic, social, and environmental aspects of urban life. It involves the planning, design, construction, and management of infrastructure, buildings, public spaces, and services to accommodate the needs of urban populations.”
(DefinitionGo.com, 2024)

Slide 6 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• Coastal Levees
• Zone A: industrial area
• Elevated roads
• Zone C: city center
• Zone D: in-land shift

Fukushima disaster: Tsunami
(Kondo & Lizarralde, 2021)

Slide 7 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• Evacuation
• Radiation contamination
• Long time period: villages uninhabitable
• Government investments


Fukushima disaster: Nuclear meltdown
(Kota, 2020; Mabon, 2019)

Slide 8 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• Post-disaster rebuilding
• Hesitation to return



Is urban development enough?
(Mabon, 2019)

Slide 9 - Diapositive

If you were a Japanese citizen from one of the affected areas, would you want to return home after learning of the urban development and rebuilding efforts of the government?
Yes
No

Slide 10 - Sondage

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• People exaggerated risk
• Adverse health effects
• 58% thought children would mutate 
• Iodine




Community resilience - Risk perception 
(Matsunaga et al., 2022)

Slide 11 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• People who stayed
• Returnees
• Prospects





To say or not to say
(Koyama, 2022)

Slide 12 - Diapositive

Who are affected most economically by the incident and the following policy?
A
The people who lived closest to the NPP
B
The TEPCO shareholders
C
Poor rural communities

Slide 13 - Quiz

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
• Infrastructure
• Contaminated soil
• Attract young people to build up the economy
• Rural communities in trouble






Financial trouble
(Schreurs, 2020)

Slide 14 - Diapositive

Does economic recovery mean recovery for everyone, or do some groups benefit more from it than others?

Slide 15 - Question ouverte

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
Community resilience - Social aspects
(Maeda et al, 2022; Maeda & Oe, 2017; Oe et al., 2021)
• Family separations
• Loss and disconnect
• Conflict leading to social fragmentation 
• Perceptions of radiation risk
• Interfamilial tensions





Slide 16 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
Community resilience - Mental aspects
(Maeda et al, 2022; Maeda & Oe, 2017; Oe et al., 2021)
• PTSD, depression and anxiety 
• Increased suicide rates and alcohol dependency
• Radiation stigma






Slide 17 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
Factors affecting mental resilience
(Maeda & Oe, 2017; Ohto et al., 2017)
• Social support
• Long-term evacuations
• Mothers and children






Slide 18 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
Community recovery efforts
(Maeda et al., 2022; Ohto et al., 2017)
• Government and local initiatives
• Rebuilding efforts
• Mental health and Lifestyle Surveys (MHLS)
• Resettlement policies
• Restoring social networks






Slide 19 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
Recovery - Mental health interventions
(Maeda et al., 2022; Oe et al., 2021)
• Outreach programs
• Mental health counseling
• Community-driven mental health initiatives






Slide 20 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
Recovery - Rebuilding social cohesion
(Ohto et al., 2017)
• Educational campaigns 
• Support for economic recovery







Slide 21 - Diapositive

If you were a policymaker, what measures would you implement to strengthen community resilience in a post-disaster situation like Fukushima?

Slide 22 - Question ouverte

“How has the Fukushima nuclear disaster influenced migration patterns, urban development and community resilience in Japan looking from a human geography perspective?”

Slide 23 - Diapositive

Fukushima disaster: tsunami 
References
Cirella, G. T. (2024). Human Geography. MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.

Crimella, C. & Dagnan C. (2012). The 11 March triple disaster in Japan. In F. Gemenne, P. Brücker, & D.
Ionesco (Eds.), The State of Environmental migration 2011 (pp. 35-46), Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations.

DefinitionGo.com. (2024, 5 October). Definition of URBAN DEVELOPMENT meaning and examples. DefinitionGo! https://definitiongo.com/urban-development/

Do, X. B. (2019). Fukushima nuclear disaster displacement: How far people moved and determinants
of evacuation destinations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 33, pp. 235-
252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.009

Entrikin, N. (2018). Geography of experience: place and region. In Paasi, A. Harrison, J. & Jones, M. (eds.) Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 44-56. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785365805.00012 

Slide 24 - Diapositive

Hauer, M. E., Holloway, S. R., & Oda, T. (2020). Evacuees and migrants exhibit different migration
systems after the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Demography, 57(4), pp. 1437-1457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00883-7

Jessop et al. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), pp. 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107

Kondo, T., & Lizarralde, G. (2021). Maladaptation, fragmentation, and other secondary effects of
centralized post-disaster urban planning: The case of the 2011 “cascading” disaster in Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 58, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102219

Kota, K. (2020). Current Status and Issues of Residents and Areas Affected by the Fukushima Nuclear
Disaster after the Lifting of Evacuation Orders. URPR, 7, 109–131. https://doi.org/10.14398/urpr.7.109

Koyama, Y. (2022). Living with contradiction – Risk perception, self-determination, and life after
Fukushima. Environmental Advances, 7, 100181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100181

Mabon, L. (2019). Enhancing post-disaster resilience by ‘building back greener’: Evaluating the
contribution of nature-based solutions to recovery planning in Futaba County, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 187, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.013

Slide 25 - Diapositive

Maeda, M., & Oe, M. (2017). Mental Health Consequences and Social Issues After the Fukushima
Disaster. Asia Pacific Journal Of Public Health, 29, 36S-46S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516689695

Maeda, M., Harigane, M., Horikoshi, N., Takebayashi, Y., Sato, H., Takahashi, A., Momoi, M., Goto, S.,
Oikawa, Y., Mizuki, R., Miura, I., Itagaki, S., Yabe, H., Ohira, T., Yasumura, S., Ohto, H., & Kamiya, K. (2022). Long-Term, Community-based Approach for Affected People Having Problems with Mental Health and Lifestyle Issues After the 2011 Fukushima Disaster: the Fukushima Health Management Survey. Journal Of Epidemiology, 32, S47-S56. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20210178 

Matsunaga, H., Orita, M., Taira, Y., Shibayama, K., Shinchi, K., & Takamura, N. (2022). Risk perception
regarding a nuclear accident and common factors related to health among guardians residing near a restarted nuclear power plant in Japan after the Fukushima accident. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 70, 102776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102776

Oe, M., Takebayashi, Y., Sato, H., & Maeda, M. (2021). Mental Health Consequences of the Three Mile
Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Nuclear Disasters: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147478


Slide 26 - Diapositive

Ohto, H., Yasumura, S., Maeda, M., Kainuma, H., Fujimori, K., & Nollet, K. E. (2017). From Devastation
to Recovery and Revival in the Aftermath of Fukushima’s Nuclear Power Plants Accident. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 29, 10S-17S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516675700

Schreurs, M. A. (2020). Reconstruction and revitalization in Fukushima a decade after the “triple
disaster” struck: Striving for sustainability and a new future vision. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53, 102006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102006






Slide 27 - Diapositive