1. Why did the attorney Rottenborn want to dismiss the case?
A
He claimed that there had been not enough evidence to say that Mr. Depp was the aggressor in the relationship.
B
He claimed that Mr. Depp was the victim in the relationship and that he could not prove that Ms. Heard acted with malice.
C
He had not presented substantial evidence to win the case for Ms. Heard.
D
He stated that Mr. Depp’s team had failed to submit clear evidence and that Mr. Depp did commit abuse to Ms. Heard.
Slide 22 - Quiz
2. How did Elton John help Mr. Depp according to the text message?
A
He helped him get evidence to win his case.
B
He gave him his extra time to make this statement.
C
He supported him during his abstinence.
D
He and Mr. Depp tricked Marilyn Manson in taking a pill so that he would stop talking that much.
Slide 23 - Quiz
3. Why was witness Richard Marks asked to testify?
A
To discuss the positive effects the op-ed by Ms. Heard had on Mr. Depp’s career.
B
To mention the devastating impact of the op-ed on Mr. Depp’s career.
C
To explain what has been written in the op-ed by Mr. Depp.
D
To outline how Mr. Depp was criticized by several articles.
Slide 24 - Quiz
4. Why did Mr. Depp ask attorney Rottenborn to read the text-message again?
A
To make fun of the fact that attorney Rottenborn had asked the same of Mr. Depp a couple of times before.
B
Because Mr. Depp had misunderstood the question being posed by the attorney.
C
Because Mr. Depp wanted to make sure he had read the text-message correctly.
D
To mock the way in which Rottenborn had asked Mr. Depp if the attorney had read everything correctly each time.
Slide 25 - Quiz
5. What did Ms. Heard say after lawyer Camille Vasquez had objected against her testimony?
A
Ms. Heard said the exact same thing twice: “I watched it.”
B
Ms. Heard said: “I was there, I watched it" and "I watched it.
C
Ms. Heard was unable to finish her sentence, starting with: “I wasn’t...”
D
Ms. Heard was instructed to stop talking by her lawyer Elaine Bredehoft, and said nothing.
Slide 26 - Quiz
6. Attorney Elaine Bredehoft impersonates Mr. Depp’s voice. Did the voice-over think this was a good impression?
A
Yes, because several people in court were smiling including Mr. Depp.
B
Yes, because they would not have included it in their top 10 otherwise.
C
No, because it is hard to impersonate Mr. Depp’s voice.
D
The voice-over leaves her opinion somewhat in the middle.
Slide 27 - Quiz
7. What was Nadelhaft questioning the witness about when he objected himself?
A
He wondered what the witness had been told about how Mr. Depp had damaged his hand.
B
He asked the witness if he knew whether Mr. Depp had seen a doctor for his damaged hand.
C
He asked the witness if he had seen Mr. Depp’s damaged hand.
D
He questioned the sincerity of the witness' testimony about Mr. Depp’s damaged hand.
Slide 28 - Quiz
8. What made Alejandro Romero’s testimony so “bizarre”?
A
It was pre-recorded and showed Romero vaping while driving.
B
It was filmed in his car while he was naked from the waist down.
C
Romero did not seem to give a hoot about the deposition and drove off during questioning after putting on his seatbelt.
D
Romero drove off in the middle of questioning after he had already begun the deposition vaping.
Slide 29 - Quiz
9. What does the voice-over mean when she mentions you could make a drinking-game out of how many times objection hearsay has been said during this trial?
A
It would make for a fun drinking-game if one had to take a shot every time objection hearsay has been said during this trial.
B
It has shocked the voice-over to hear objection hearsay so many times and has left her feeling a bit drunk.
C
The voice-over is trying to explain how the objection has led to others saying it all the time like they are drunk.
D
A drinking-game would be the only thing that could make this trial interesting to look at with so many objections.
Slide 30 - Quiz
10. Did the jury already reach a verdict on this trial?
A
Yes, they did.
B
Yes, they all agreed that Camille Vasquez is an amazing lawyer.