At the end of the lesson, you will be able to objectively assess whether or not Marijke is a poohead based on the evidence presented.
Slide 2 - Slide
Background Information
Marijke is a person who has been accused of being a poohead by some individuals. However, the validity of this claim has never been fully explored.
Slide 3 - Slide
Defining Terms
Before we proceed, let's define what we mean by the term 'poohead.' For the purpose of this lesson, a poohead is someone who has engaged in behavior that is deemed inappropriate or offensive by others.
Slide 4 - Slide
The Evidence for Marijke's Poohead Status
Let's examine the evidence that has been presented to support the claim that Marijke is a poohead.
Slide 5 - Slide
Evidence #1: Name-calling
One piece of evidence that has been used to support the claim that Marijke is a poohead is that people have called her names such as 'poopface' or 'butt-head.'
Slide 6 - Slide
Evidence #2: Social Media Posts
Another piece of evidence that has been presented is that Marijke has posted comments on social media that some people deem offensive or inappropriate.
Slide 7 - Slide
Evidence #3: Personal Testimony
Some people have claimed that Marijke has engaged in behavior that they deem inappropriate or offensive, and they have shared their personal experiences to support this claim.
Slide 8 - Slide
Counterarguments
Now let's examine some counterarguments that have been presented to refute the claim that Marijke is a poohead.
Slide 9 - Slide
Counterargument #1: Context
Some people argue that the behavior that has been deemed inappropriate or offensive by others was taken out of context, and that Marijke is not actually a poohead.
Slide 10 - Slide
Counterargument #2: Personal Opinion
Others argue that what is considered inappropriate or offensive is subjective, and that Marijke's behavior may not be considered poohead-worthy by everyone.
Slide 11 - Slide
Counterargument #3: Group Mentality
Some people suggest that the accusation of poohead status is part of a group mentality or mob mentality, and that it may not be based on objective evidence.
Slide 12 - Slide
Critical Assessment
Now that we have examined the evidence and counterarguments, let's engage in a critical assessment of the arguments presented.
Slide 13 - Slide
Assessment #1: Evidence Validity
How valid is the evidence that has been presented to support the claim that Marijke is a poohead? Are there other possible interpretations of the evidence?
Slide 14 - Slide
Assessment #2: Counterargument Validity
How valid are the counterarguments that have been presented to refute the claim that Marijke is a poohead? Are there other possible interpretations of the counterarguments?
Slide 15 - Slide
Assessment #3: Personal Opinion
To what extent do personal opinions and biases influence our assessment of whether or not Marijke is a poohead?
Slide 16 - Slide
Assessment #4: Group Mentality
To what extent does group mentality or mob mentality influence our assessment of whether or not Marijke is a poohead?
Slide 17 - Slide
Conclusion
Based on the evidence and counterarguments presented, what is your assessment of whether or not Marijke is a poohead?
Slide 18 - Slide
Reflection
What did you learn from this lesson about critical assessment and the importance of evidence-based judgments?
Slide 19 - Slide
Further Exploration
If you are interested in exploring the concept of critical assessment further, here are some resources you may find helpful.
Slide 20 - Slide
References
Here are the sources we used to gather information for this lesson.
Lesson duration is: 60 min
