Reading Comprehension Havo 2021-I Tuesday the 29th of November
1 / 16
Lesson duration is: 45 minItems in this lesson
Slide 1 - Slide
Slide 2 - Video
Slide 3 - Slide
Slide 4 - Slide
“A waiter sacked” (paragraph 1)
1p 1) Which of the following becomes clear from the tribunal hearing about this sacking?
1p 1) Which of the following becomes clear from the tribunal hearing about this sacking?
A
Canadians do not seem to appreciate the way in which French waiters do their job.
B
French hospitality personnel have better legal rights than their
Canadian counterparts.
C
It is impossible for foreign employees to adjust to Canadian work standards and ethics.
Slide 5 - Quiz
1p 2) How does paragraph 4 relate to the first part of this text?
A
It highlights the fact that the dismissal of the waiter was illegal.
B
It makes clear that Canadians know little about France.
C
It makes fun of how people think about the French.
D
It provides context for the explanation offered by the waiter.
Slide 6 - Quiz
Slide 7 - Video
Slide 8 - Slide
Slide 9 - Slide
“government meddling” (paragraph 1)
1p 3) Which of the following is an example of ‘government meddling’?
1p 3) Which of the following is an example of ‘government meddling’?
A
“Digging through household survey data” (paragraph 2)
B
“spending on pet health care” (paragraph 2)
C
“regulation” (paragraph 3)
D
“health care trends” (paragraph 3)
Slide 10 - Quiz
1p 4) Geef van de volgende stijlfiguren aan of de schrijver deze heeft gebruikt in dit artikel:
overdrijving
overdrijving
A
WEL
B
NIET
Slide 11 - Quiz
1p 4) Geef van de volgende stijlfiguren aan of de schrijver deze heeft gebruikt in dit artikel:
woordspeling
woordspeling
A
WEL
B
NIET
Slide 12 - Quiz
Slide 13 - Slide
Slide 14 - Video
Slide 15 - Slide
5) Which of the following letters presents the same argument as Steve McMahon uses in his letter?
A
A
B
B
C
C
